本頁只刊出中文翻譯與中文說明；英文原文請見下方原文連結。
原文連結
論文資訊
- 類型：已發表論文
- 日期：2010
摘要
Binmore and Shaked (this issue) criticize Fehr and Schmidt's (1999) model of 不平等 aversion. We present a considerable body of experimental research supporting the 不平等 aversion motive. Binmore and Shaked also urge experimentalists to adopt "a more skeptical attitude when far-reaching claims about human behavior are extrapolated from very slender data." It is true that experimental findings indicate that the standard neoclassical model fails to predict a considerable range of strategic behaviors widely observed in the laboratory, particularly under conditions where normative behavior is prevalent in every-day 社會 life. This is indeed a "far-reaching claim," but one amply justified by an impressive and constantly growing body of evidence from experiment.
※ 此為已發表論文，全文需透過期刊付費取得