聖塔非研究所

摘要 This work responds to a criticism of effective co

2020-01-03 · 已發表論文 · 更新 2026/08/30 下午12:48

摘要 This work responds to a criticism of effective complexity made by James McAllister, according to which such a notion is not an appropriate measure for 資訊 content. Roughly, effective compl…

本頁只刊出中文翻譯與中文說明;英文原文請見下方原文連結。

原文連結

論文資訊

  • 類型:已發表論文
  • 日期:2020-01-03

摘要

This work responds to a criticism of effective complexity made by James McAllister, according to which such a notion is not an appropriate measure for 資訊 content. Roughly, effective complexity is focused on the regularities of the data rather than on the whole data, as opposed to algorithmic complexity. McAllister’s argument shows that, because the set of relevant regularities for a given object is not unique, one cannot assign unique values of effective complexity to considered expressions and, therefore, that algorithmic complexity better serves as a measure of 資訊 than effective complexity. We accept that problem regarding uniqueness as McAllister presents it, but would not deny that if contexts could be defined appropriately, one could in principle find unique values of effective comple

※ 此為已發表論文,全文需透過期刊付費取得