本頁只刊出中文翻譯與中文說明；英文原文請見下方原文連結。
原文連結
論文資訊
- 類型：已發表論文
- 日期：2021-05-20
摘要
How do people make judgments about characteristics of their peers? We investigate what 認知 strategies underlie peer judgments, what group-level patterns of judgments do these strategies produce, and whether they generate accurate judgments. We develop a general model that allows for comparison of different 認知 strategies including ego-projection, frequency-based, memory, and inference strategies. We apply it on a unique data set including self-reports and peer judgments of substance use among homeless youth (N=239). We find evidence for the adaptive use of strategies that are most appropriate given the 資訊 available from one’s personal experience and 社會 environment. On the group level, the pattern of judgments sometimes resembles false consensus, but overall shows a high level of accuracy.
※ 此為已發表論文，全文需透過期刊付費取得