摘要 We thank Burgess et al. (1) for their contributio

本頁只刊出中文翻譯與中文說明；英文原文請見下方原文連結。

原文連結

• SFI 頁面
• DOI

論文資訊

• 類型：已發表論文
• 日期：2022-10-10

摘要

We thank Burgess et al. (1) for their contribution, “Catas營養級 氣候 risks should be neither understated or overstated,” in response to “氣候 Endgame” (2). We agree that studying catas營養級 氣候 scenarios and extreme risk mitigation is imperative We disagree that catas營養級 scenarios are already adequately or excessively studied. Counting the Shared Socio經濟 Pathway (SSP) SSP3-7.0 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios used in the Intergovernmental Panel on 氣候 Change AR6 Working Group II report is not a good proxy for catas營養級 氣候 risk assessment. The scenarios only account for anthropogenic emissions (each with a range of temperature outcomes), not extreme risk assessment. Even just for high-end warming scenarios, more granular text-mining reports (3, 4) show these are under-studied relative to their likelihood and lo

※ 此為已發表論文，全文需透過期刊付費取得