聖塔非研究所

摘要 Different theoretical frameworks have been invoke

2024 · 已發表論文 · 更新 2026/08/30 下午12:48

摘要 Different theoretical frameworks have been invoked to guide the study of 病毒 演化. Three of the more prominent ones are (i) the 演化 of virulence, (ii) life history theory, and (iii) the gener…

本頁只刊出中文翻譯與中文說明;英文原文請見下方原文連結。

原文連結

論文資訊

  • 類型:已發表論文
  • 日期:2024

摘要

Different theoretical frameworks have been invoked to guide the study of 病毒 演化. Three of the more prominent ones are (i) the 演化 of virulence, (ii) life history theory, and (iii) the generalism-specialism dichotomy. All involve purported tradeoffs between traits that define the evolvability and constraint of 病毒-associated phenotypes. However, as popular as these frameworks are, there is a surprising paucity of direct laboratory tests of the frameworks that support their utility as broadly applicable theoretical pillars that can guide our understanding of 疾病 演化. In this study, we conduct a meta-analysis of direct experimental evidence for these three frameworks across several widely studied 病毒-host systems: plant 病毒es, fungal 病毒es, animal 病毒es, and bacteriophages. We extracted 60 datasets fr

※ 此為已發表論文,全文需透過期刊付費取得